Too little
Publish the invented praise because the draft supplied it and the exhibition needs attention.
Keep your ethical standards when automation makes a questionable action easy.
Consistency between considered ethical convictions and deliberate action.
Integrity keeps considered ethical commitments connected to action. Assistance can make it easier to write, compare or present your work; it can also make an exception look like a ready-made paragraph. A convenient means does not remove your part in choosing it. Keep the standard that mattered before the shortcut appeared.
Try a practice
You ask for help describing the handmade notebooks at your small exhibition. Alongside a neat description, the draft offers three enthusiastic customer testimonials. They sound wonderfully satisfied, especially considering that none of them exists. You remove the invented customers and describe features visitors can inspect. The notebooks will have to win their own admirers.
People can encounter your work on terms you are prepared to defend. A persuasive description can rest on real features, with trust built through what you actually offer.
Publish the invented praise because the draft supplied it and the exhibition needs attention.
Use the clear description, remove fictitious testimony, and describe the notebooks without manufacturing customers.
Reject all help with wording as though receiving assistance necessarily made the description dishonest.
The ethical distinction concerns what the words represent. Help with expression can serve a truthful purpose; attributing invented experience to real-seeming customers cannot.
Use a tool to organize your actual experience without converting suggestions into achievements you never had.
Keep an inconvenient qualification even when removing it would make your project easier to promote.
Candor makes relevant assistance or uncertainty clear; Integrity also governs what you choose to submit.
Temperance can interrupt the appetite for a more flattering result before it drives the choice.
A counterfeit of Integrity is transferring responsibility to the tool: “That is what it wrote.” Review the representation you are choosing to make and correct what conflicts with your standards.
Use an invented, low-stakes example such as a fictional club notice. Identify one attractive sentence you could not truthfully stand behind and replace it with a claim the stated facts support.
The situations on these pages are illustrative. These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.
About these practicesRead these passages in their original settings through the source links.
Get them habitually to tell the truth, not so much through showing them the wickedness of lying as by arousing their enthusiasm for honor and veracity.
William James, Talks to Teachers on Psychology; and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals
XV. the Will · excerpt
James urges teachers to cultivate a positive regard for truthfulness. A truthful description can be something worth making, beyond the removal of false praise.
Neither is the modern dedication of books and writings, as to patrons, to be commended, for that books (such as are worthy the name of books) ought to have no patrons but truth and reason.
Francis Bacon, The Advancement of Learning
Book I · excerpt
Bacon argues that worthy writing owes allegiance to truth and reason. Praise or patronage cannot make invented evidence legitimate.
When the harp is truly strung, when there is not the slightest laxity in the strength of the bond, then only does music result; and the string transcending itself in its melody finds at every chord its true freedom.
Rabindranath Tagore, Sadhana: The Realisation of Life
Realisation in Action · excerpt ·
English rendering: Surendra Nath Tagore (preface credit for “Realisation in Action”).
In “Realisation in Action,” Tagore uses a tuned harp to join constraint and freedom. Standards can enable a worthwhile result rather than merely obstruct it.
Yet it is in these dear intimacies, beyond all others, that we must strive and do battle for the truth.
Robert Louis Stevenson, Virginibus Puerisque and Other Papers
IV.—Truth of Intercourse · excerpt
Stevenson’s subject is truthful intimacy. Familiarity and affection increase the value of honesty rather than making concealment harmless.
And labor is everywhere welcome; always we are invited to work; only be this limitation observed, that a man shall not for the sake of wider activity sacrifice any opinion to the popular judgments and modes of action.
Ralph Waldo Emerson, The American Scholar
The American Scholar · excerpt
Emerson’s discussion of action includes a limit: wider participation should not purchase agreement by sacrificing considered judgment.
She had not been withstanding them on selfish principles alone, she had not consulted merely her own gratification; that might have been ensured in some degree by the excursion itself, by seeing Blaize Castle; no, she had attended to what was due to others, and to her own character in their opinion.
The narrator, in Jane Austen, Northanger Abbey
Chapter 13 · excerpt
The narrator describes Catherine holding to an engagement under social pressure. Her choice considers what is owed to others as well as immediate enjoyment.
I hardly know anything more strange than that you recognise honesty in play, and you do not in work.
John Ruskin, The Crown of Wild Olive — Work
Work · excerpt
In the “Work” lecture, Ruskin asks why standards readily recognized in games are relaxed in work. A change of setting should not quietly excuse dishonesty.
Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.