Integrity

Refuse to invent or distort evidence even when your preferred explanation would benefit.

Consistency between considered ethical convictions and deliberate action.

Integrity aligns deliberate action with considered ethical convictions. When resisting deception, it means using methods of representation you could defend even if the conclusion favored your opponents. A truthful account can be forceful without being engineered to make every detail incriminating.

Try a practice

The mascot keeps the first panel of an unfolded account beside the altered later panel.

Examine the account

Your group has found a genuine alteration in a public statement. A colleague suggests removing the awkward sentence showing that an earlier version was innocent: the finding will “land better.” You retain the sequence and explain what changed. A real concern deserves better than an embellished case.

An invented illustrative scene.

Integrity gives…

evidence you would still stand behind

What Integrity makes possible

Your account gives others reasons they can inspect and use. It also holds up when challenged: an inconvenient earlier version is already present, so correcting the inference need not collapse the whole case.

Integrity: finding the balance

Too little

Win by distortion

Leave out the harmless version; the larger point is true.

A justified concern is made to depend on a misleading representation.

A fitting response

Keep the standard

Show both versions and explain exactly where the alteration occurred.

The finding can be examined without relying on an exaggerated sequence.

Pursued too far

Refuse all persuasion

An ethical account must avoid emphasis or a clear conclusion.

Scruple becomes a reason to hide the significance of well-supported evidence.

A sound cause does not improve a misleading method. Clear emphasis can help the reader while faithful context keeps that emphasis defensible.

Integrity in ordinary life

A persuasive presentation

Keep the context that limits your claim, and explain why the remaining finding still matters.

A convenient metric

Use the same reporting rule when the result reflects badly on your own group.

Nearby virtues, different work

Fairness

Fairness gives claims impartial consideration; Integrity brings your own conduct under the ethical standard you invoke.

Exactitude

Exactitude preserves a detail; Integrity refuses its deliberate distortion for advantage.

Integrity and its counterfeits

The noble edit

This is a counterfeit of Integrity: deleting exculpatory context for a worthy cause asks the reader to trust a manipulated account. Keep the context and state the supported concern.

Purity as disappearance

This is a counterfeit of Integrity: declining to communicate a justified finding because every presentation involves choice leaves relevant people uninformed. Choose an honest presentation.

How to cultivate Integrity

Identify the ethical standard your criticism relies on.
Apply it to your own selection and arrangement of evidence.
Keep a consequential inconvenient fact in the final account and explain it.

Try it today

Take a harmless argument you are preparing. Include one real limitation and make the strongest claim that remains warranted.

Use ordinary material for practice. Integrity does not require disclosing protected information or confronting an authority without regard to consequences.

Questions worth returning to

Could I defend this method if it supported the other side?
Which omission would make the reader misunderstand the sequence?

Keep the practice proportionate

Use ordinary material for practice. Integrity does not require disclosing protected information or confronting an authority without regard to consequences.

These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.

About these practices

Quotations and further reading

Seven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.

… We not only say that it is wrong to tell lies, but that it is wrong to deceive in other more ingenious ways; wrong to use words so that they shall have one sense to some people and another sense to other people; wrong to suppress the truth when that suppression leads to false belief in others. …
William Kingdon Clifford · The Scientific Basis of Morals, and Other Essays
(zero-based), exact character span 1093–1387
William Kingdon Clifford · 1884 collected edition; essays first published earlier
Clifford includes ingenious deception and misleading suppression among the wrongs he describes. The omitted innocent version would create precisely that false belief in the report’s readers.
If we could only be judged or judge other people by purity of motive, life would be much simplified, but that would be to abandon the contention made in the first chapter, that the processes of life are as important as its aims. …
Jane Addams · Democracy and Social Ethics
(zero-based), exact character span 0–228
Jane Addams · 1902 work; Gutenberg 15487 transcription
Addams insists that the process matters as well as the aim. Finding a real alteration does not justify representing its sequence through a deliberately misleading omission.
L'art de bien dire is but a drawing-room accomplishment unless it be pressed into the service of the truth. …
Robert Louis Stevenson · Truth of Intercourse
(zero-based), exact character span 0–107
Robert Louis Stevenson · 1879 essay; Harvard Classics volume 28 historical anthology, Gutenberg 21962
Stevenson places eloquence in the service of truth. The article permits a forceful presentation while refusing the edit that makes it persuasive by changing the impression.
… Thus expediency is continually contrasted with simple principles, till truth is lost in a mist of words, virtue in forms, and knowledge rendered a sounding nothing, by the specious prejudices that assume its name.
Mary Wollstonecraft · A Vindication of the Rights of Woman
(zero-based), exact character span 248–461
Mary Wollstonecraft · 1792 work; Gutenberg 3420 transcription; modern prefatory material excluded
Wollstonecraft criticizes expediency obscuring principles in words and forms. The worthy cause in the article must still be presented by the ethical standard it invokes.
… To righteousness, in speaking the truth freely, and without ambiguity; and in doing all things justly and discreetly. …
Marcus Aurelius · Meditations
(zero-based), exact character span 573–690
Marcus Aurelius · Meric Casaubon translation, first published 1634; Gutenberg 2680 transcription
Historical English translation
Aurelius joins truthful speech with just and discreet action. The faithful sequence is a deliberate act as well as an accurate statement.
… When you get the better of your argument; ‘tis truth that wins; when you get the advantage of form and method, ‘tis then you who win. …
Michel de Montaigne · Essays
(zero-based), exact character span 130–263
Michel de Montaigne · Charles Cotton translation, revised by William Carew Hazlitt; Gutenberg 3600
Historical English translation
Montaigne separates winning for truth from winning through form. The article asks which victory the proposed deletion of context would actually produce.
… We have no desire to deceive ourselves upon any of these points, and therefore we have no superstitious shrinking from the rigid reductio ad absurdum. …
Mary Everest Boole · Philosophy and Fun of Algebra
(zero-based), exact character span 398–548
Mary Everest Boole · 1909 work, chapter 5; captured Wikisource transcription
Boole’s aversion to self-deception in concrete calculation supplies a positive aim. The report should remain one you can examine yourself without needing its persuasive omission.

Continue through the catalog

Practice this collection

Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.

Explore the program · Choose in My Virtues