Too little
Emotional verdict: dismiss the card because its arrival embarrasses you.
Maintain emotional steadiness so irritation, sympathy, or suspicion do not distort your reading of events.
Inner steadiness amid changing circumstances.
Try a practice
At a mystery-card game, the next card disproves your elegant solution. Across the table, someone cheers; you feel a brief pang. You set the card beside the others and read what it changes. The answer has moved, but it has not become your enemy.
This is an invented illustrative scene.
Equanimity brings inner steadiness to changing information. Pleasure in a successful prediction and disappointment in a failed one can both be felt without determining the next assessment. The habit matters because an inquiry changes as it proceeds. You can acknowledge the feeling and still let the new detail alter the account on its merits.
Equanimity gives the next question continuity with the purpose of inquiry. You do not have to turn a disconfirmed answer into a personal defeat or a confirmed one into permanent superiority. That steadiness helps a group keep playing and learning together.
A pause can make room to distinguish “I am disappointed” from “the evidence is bad.” You may return after rest or ask for a quieter conversation. A supported objection remains possible; steadiness does not require an agreeable verdict.
Emotional verdict: dismiss the card because its arrival embarrasses you.
Steady revision: acknowledge disappointment, then examine what the card changes.
Frozen display: concentrate on looking untroubled while refusing to engage with either the feeling or the evidence.
Let disappointment register without making it the measure of the new information. You can feel the surprise and still read what the card contributes.
Let a mystery’s reveal change your account even when another ending would have pleased you more.
Take a pause before assessing a factual correction to your own story.
Self-Restraint checks a harmful impulse; Equanimity concerns the steadiness with which circumstances are met.
Intellectual Honesty gives contrary evidence its effect; Equanimity helps you remain steady while doing so.
Detached appearance counterfeits Equanimity when looking calm matters more than engaging honestly. Equanimity allows disappointment, enthusiasm and a firm response while keeping those feelings from replacing judgment.
When a low-stakes result differs from your expectation, acknowledge your response and identify one implication of the actual result. You may pause or choose a fictional example; the task is to assess the information while allowing the feeling.
Later, notice whether the new information altered the account or only your mood about it.
These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.
About these practicesSeven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.
His temper was imperturbably good, with the most winning and courteous manners; yet, as I have seen, he could be roused by any bad action to the warmest indignation and prompt action.
Charles Darwin · The Autobiography of Charles Darwin
CAMBRIDGE 1828-1831.
Charles Darwin, describing John Stevens Henslow · Project Gutenberg 2010 display edition of Francis Darwin’s edited 1887 autobiographical text
Darwin’s portrait of Henslow joins steadiness with a vigorous objection. Inner steadiness need not make every response mild or agreeable.
… I was out of temper with him, because I was out of temper with myself.
Wilkie Collins · The Moonstone
CHAPTER XV
Gabriel Betteredge, narrator · 1868 novel; Project Gutenberg 155 display edition
Betteredge identifies the displacement behind a sharp response. A feeling about ourselves can quietly become a judgment about the person helping us inquire.
… it was spoken under momentary excitement, without foresight of the consequences, and possibly without due consideration of the facts.
Anna Katharine Green · The Leavenworth Case
2. The disappearance of Hannah points no more certainly in one direction than another.
Everett Raymond, narrator · 1878 novel; Project Gutenberg 4047 display edition
Raymond examines the circumstances of a forceful accusation. Emotional force can be acknowledged without giving it the evidential weight of a considered account.
I must not think so much of how circumstances affect me myself, but how they affect others, if I wish to have a right judgment, or a hopeful trustful heart.
Elizabeth Gaskell · North and South
CHAPTER XLVI. ONCE AND NOW.
Margaret Hale · 1854–1855 serial; 1855 book; Project Gutenberg 4276 display edition
Margaret widens her attention beyond her immediate personal reaction. That change can help a feeling remain part of experience instead of becoming the whole judgment.
These are liable to so great variety of contrary observations, circumstances, reports, different qualifications, tempers, designs, oversights …
John Locke · An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume II
9. Experience and Testimonies clashing, infinitely vary the Degrees of Probability.
John Locke · Project Gutenberg 10616 display edition, described as based on the second edition; Books III and IV
Locke names the varied conditions affecting reports. Notice a reporter’s situation without inventing a diagnostic rule or treating an emotional response as automatic proof.
… had listened with a frowning brow and a compressed lip to this long narrative.
Arthur Conan Doyle · The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
“‘ROBERT ST. SIMON.’
Dr. Watson, describing Lord St. Simon · 1892 collection; Project Gutenberg 1661 display edition
Watson describes Lord St. Simon’s rigid reception of an unwelcome account. This is a contrast to steadiness: a controlled appearance can coexist with resistance to new information.
… the stronger the temper, the greater is the need of self-discipline and self-control.
Samuel Smiles · Character
CHAPTER VI.—SELF-CONTROL.
Samuel Smiles · 1871 work; Project Gutenberg 2541 display edition
Smiles recognizes the need to guide a forceful reaction. Restraint can support steadiness, but this is not a demand to conceal distress or a definition equating the two virtues.
Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.