Too little
The profitable exception
“This one order will fund better work later.”
A future good is used to excuse the present breach.
Keep an ethical limit when a profitable opportunity makes an exception tempting.
Consistency between considered ethical convictions and deliberate action.
Integrity brings deliberate action into line with considered ethical convictions. Enterprise gives principles practical tests: an attractive order may ask for the very exception you would reject in an ordinary one. Keeping a defensible limit makes the purpose govern the method.

A buyer offers a large order if your repair shop will put its “reconditioned” label on untouched appliances. The label roll sits beside a generous deposit envelope. You leave the roll on its spindle and offer the actual inspection and repair service instead. The labels are cheap; that is not what makes the proposed job costly.
An illustrative scene.
A profitable order asks a repair business to apply a claim its work has not earned.
Too little
“This one order will fund better work later.”
A future good is used to excuse the present breach.
A fitting response
“We can label only the work we actually complete.”
The ethical commitment governs this opportunity as well as ordinary ones.
Pursued too far
“A rule is right because I have always used it.”
Habit is protected from ethical examination.
A principle can be revised for a good reason. The question is whether the reason withstands scrutiny beyond the benefit of this particular exception.
Practised integrity gives a venture a coherent way to choose its work. Colleagues can see which opportunities it will pursue and which methods it will refuse. This may cost income; it also keeps a worthy aim from becoming a permanent excuse for means that undermine it.
Keep a contributor’s credit even when removing it would make your role look larger.
Disclose a relevant interest when the recommendation is presented as independent.
Honesty concerns truthful representation. Integrity concerns the consistency between a considered conviction and the action it governs.
Temperance moderates the desire for gain. Integrity applies the ethical limit even when the gain is genuinely useful.
A values statement counterfeits Integrity when actual decisions routinely make profitable exceptions to it.
State the ethical limit in words that describe an actual choice.
Apply it to a tempting case, including costs to yourself.
Reconsider principles for ethical reasons rather than merely profitable circumstances.
Privately choose a modest ethical commitment and imagine a convenient exception. Identify an alternative you could responsibly take; do not risk livelihood or disclose protected information as an exercise.
These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.
About these practicesSeven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.
Mr. Berry has never refused to serve colored men at his hotel—indeed, he says he would rather lose his customers than to be guilty of that sort of disloyalty.
Booker T. Washington · The Negro in Business
Printed p. 67, account of Edward C. Berry; PDF page index 75
Booker T. Washington · Hertel, Jenkins & Co., 1907; Internet Archive scan negroinbusiness00washgoog.
Washington reports Berry refusing racial exclusion despite commercial pressure. The historical setting and language remain explicit. The shared principle is maintaining an ethical limit when keeping it may lose custom; the appliance scene does not equate its stakes with racial discrimination.
It is impossible to conclude, of any given mass of acquired wealth, merely by the fact of its existence, whether it signifies good or evil to the nation in the midst of which it exists.
John Ruskin · Unto This Last and Other Essays on Political Economy
UNTO THIS LAST: / ESSAY II. / THE VEINS OF WEALTH.; paragraph beginning “The whole question, therefore, respecting not only the advantage, but even the quantity, o…”
John Ruskin · Ward, Lock & Co., London, Melbourne and Toronto, 1912; Project Gutenberg #36541.
Ruskin insists that accumulated wealth does not certify the means by which it was obtained. The deposit cannot turn an unearned label into a legitimate claim.
I grew convinc’d that truth, sincerity and integrity in dealings between man and man were of the utmost importance to the felicity of life; and I form’d written resolutions, which still remain in my journal book, to practice them ever while I lived.
Benjamin Franklin · Autobiography
Autobiography — First narrative portion: resolutions on truth, sincerity and integrity; paragraph containing “I grew convinc’d”; paragraph beginning “I grew convinc’d that truth, sincerity and integrity in dealings between man and man were…”
Benjamin Franklin · Harvard Classics, edited by Charles W. Eliot; P. F. Collier & Son, New York, 1909; Project Gutenberg #148.
Franklin connects an ethical conviction to resolutions governing actual dealings. The appliance label is the point at which a declared standard must become a commercial decision.
I should be a rich man, and my peace of conscience would be gone!
Elizabeth Gaskell · North and South
North and South / CHAPTER L CHANGES AT MILTON.; paragraph beginning ““I should be a rich man, and my peace of conscience would be gone!”…”
John Thornton, in Elizabeth Gaskell’s North and South · Walter Scott, Limited, Paternoster Square, London; title page undated in preserved Project Gutenberg #4276 capture.
Thornton refuses the suggestion that a successful gamble would erase the wrong of risking creditors’ funds. The appliance seller likewise judges the means before accepting the profitable outcome.
Very often people who admit the facts, who are willing to see that Mr. Rockefeller has employed force and fraud to secure his ends, justify him by declaring, “It’s business.” That is, “it’s business” has to come to be a legitimate excuse for hard dealing, sly tricks, special privileges. It is a common enough thing to hear men arguing that the ordinary laws of morality do not apply in business.
Ida M. Tarbell · The History of the Standard Oil Company
Volume II; CHAPTER EIGHTEEN CONCLUSION; paragraph beginning “Very often people who admit the facts, who are willing to see that Mr. Rockefeller has emp…”
Ida M. Tarbell · Volume II, McClure, Phillips & Co., New York, MCMV (1905), second impression; copyright 1904; Project Gutenberg #60692.
Tarbell reports and rejects the claim that business suspends ordinary morality. This directly challenges the buyer’s invitation to attach an unearned label for a profitable order; display must identify the argument as one she criticizes.
The effects on the very men who fight these methods on the ground that they are ethically wrong are deplorable. Brought into competition with the trust, badgered, foiled, spied upon, they come to feel as if anything is fair when the Standard is the opponent.
Ida M. Tarbell · The History of the Standard Oil Company
Volume II; CHAPTER EIGHTEEN CONCLUSION; paragraph beginning “The effects on the very men who fight these methods on the ground that they are ethically…”
Ida M. Tarbell · Volume II, McClure, Phillips & Co., New York, MCMV (1905), second impression; copyright 1904; Project Gutenberg #60692.
Tarbell describes the corruption of an opponent’s own standards through retaliation. The business must preserve the meaning of its label even when competitors appear to prosper through deception.
And ‘tis only lawful, upon the account of private interest, to excuse breach of promise, when we have promised something that is unlawful and wicked in itself; for the right of virtue ought to take place of the right of any obligation of ours.
Michel de Montaigne · Essays, translated by Charles Cotton, edited by William Carew Hazlitt
Book III; CHAPTER I——OF PROFIT AND HONESTY; paragraph beginning “And ‘tis only lawful, upon the account of private interest, to excuse breach of promise, w…”
Michel de Montaigne · Charles Cotton translation, edited by William Carew Hazlitt, 1877; Project Gutenberg #3600.
Translated by Charles Cotton; edited by William Carew Hazlitt
Montaigne gives ethical limits priority over a wrongful promise. If the seller has provisionally entertained the buyer’s proposal, that does not create a duty to put a false reconditioned label on an appliance. This is moral reasoning in a historical essay, not legal guidance.
Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.