Magnanimity

Acknowledge an opponent's good play without adding an excuse for your defeat.

Freedom from petty resentment when another's standing challenges one's pride.

Try a practice
Two players revisit a chess position together; the grey player points out a move while the orange player considers it.

What Magnanimity means in play

You are reviewing a board-game loss. Your opponent points out a quiet move made several turns before the finish. You had called it harmless. Now its purpose becomes clear, and your hand hovers over the board to try the combination yourself. For a moment you forget to defend your reputation. “That was clever,” you say. You have lost a game and found something worth learning.

Magnanimity makes room for another player’s achievement when pride would rather shrink it. The pleasure of a good game includes discovering possibilities you did not see. You can acknowledge the move precisely and still wish you had answered it. Admiration need not await a painless defeat, and it need not become a claim that every part of the opponent’s conduct was admirable.

Finding the balance

Too little

Diminishing the move: explain it away as luck before examining it.

A fitting response

Recognizing the achievement: name the combination and ask about it if the opponent wants to discuss it.

Pursued too far

Performing lavish praise: exaggerate admiration to appear above caring about the result.

In ordinary play

A racing game

Recognize the rival’s clean overtaking move, even while reviewing how you might defend it next time.

A shared design challenge

Notice an inventive solution by someone whose work you hoped to outshine.

Nearby virtues, different work

Humility

Humility admits the limit of your reading of the position. Magnanimity lets you welcome the rival’s achievement despite the sting to your pride.

Recognizing a counterfeit

Patronizing praise counterfeits Magnanimity: “Quite good for someone like you” preserves a claim of superiority inside the compliment. Recognition lets the achievement stand on its own.

Cultivating Magnanimity

  • Look closely enough to name what the other player did well.
  • Let the acknowledgment stand without attaching an explanation of your own result.

Try it today

After a game, name one decision by another player that you appreciated. Offer the acknowledgment without adding an excuse for your result.

Questions worth returning to

  • What made the other player’s decision effective or interesting?
  • Did recognizing it change what I could learn from the game?

Choose your practice

These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.

About these practices

Quotations and further reading

Seven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.

  1. Black's play from now to the end is admirably consistent and strong.

    Emanuel Lasker · Common Sense in Chess
    Lecture VII, p. 83
    Emanuel Lasker · J. S. Ogilvie Publishing Company, New York; undated title page, cataloged circa 1910, Internet Archive commonsenseinche00laskrich. Selected wording checked against preserved page images.

    Lasker praises Zuckertort’s consistency and strength in a game against Steinitz. Naming what another player did well gives recognition something precise to rest on.

  2. She loved a thorough-paced partner, a determined enemy. She took, and gave, no concessions.

    Charles Lamb · Elia: Mrs. Battle’s Opinions on Whist
    Mrs. Battle’s Opinions on Whist
    Elia, narrated by Charles Lamb · E. V. Lucas edited Works of Charles and Mary Lamb, volume II, Project Gutenberg 10343; essay first published 1821; this edited transcription is the display source

    Lamb’s formidable Sarah Battle respects an opponent who plays seriously. Her portrait gives competitive respect a comic edge; the opponent’s determination is part of the pleasure.

  3. A defeated player should be led to recognize and do honor to the prowess of his adversary, and so to congratulate him honestly.

    Jessie H. Bancroft · Games for the Playground, Home, School and Gymnasium
    To the Teacher of Games, p. 32
    Jessie H. Bancroft · Project Gutenberg #25660; introduction dated March 1909; Linked text does not identify a dated title-page imprint.

    The opponent’s skill remains worth noticing after a loss. An honest acknowledgment can be brief and specific.

  4. remembering, however, that we are trying to conquer, not our enemies, but our friends; therefore, if we win we have cause for congratulating ourselves, if we lose let us be quite as ready to congratulate our opponents.

    Anonymous (Cassell’s compilation) · Cassell’s Book of In-Door Amusements, Card Games, and Fireside Fun
    Whist, concluding advice on the spirit of play
    Anonymous contributor to Cassell’s Book of In-Door Amusements · Third edition, Cassell, Petter, Galpin & Co., London, Paris and New York; title page undated in preserved Project Gutenberg #49137 transcription.

    This unsigned passage belongs to Cassell’s household compilation; the individual writer is not identified. This advice follows a competitive maxim but remembers the relationship across the table. A worthy opponent’s success belongs in the account of a good game.

  5. We ought not therefore to be niggardly in our praise and honour of an enemy that deserves a good name.

    Plutarch · Morals: Ethical Essays
    How a Man May Be Benefited by His Enemies, IX
    Plutarch · Arthur Richard Shilleto translation, Bohn’s Classical Library; Project Gutenberg #23639; preface Cambridge, March 1888.
    English translation by Arthur Richard Shilleto

    Plutarch asks for fair acknowledgment even across an enmity. A friendly rival’s clever move deserves at least that much openness.

  6. I was not so mean as to resent the past; and I hoped to obtain your forgiveness, to lessen your ill opinion, by letting you see that your reproofs had been attended to.

    Jane Austen · Pride and Prejudice
    Chapter LVIII, Darcy explains his changed conduct at Pemberley
    Mr. Darcy · Hugh Thomson illustrated edition with George Saintsbury preface, Project Gutenberg 1342; title-page date not identified in Linked text

    Darcy describes acting on a painful reproof. Pride need not prevent acknowledgment of something another person has shown one.

  7. certain persons do exist with an enormous capacity for friendship and for taking delight in other people's lives; and that such persons know more of truth than if their hearts were not so big.

    William James · Talks to Teachers on Psychology; and to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals
    Talks to Students, III. What Makes a Life Significant
    William James · Henry Holt and Company, New York, 1925; Project Gutenberg #16287.

    James broadens his discussion of affection into delight in other lives. A rival’s success can become something to appreciate as well as something to answer.

Continue through the catalog

Practice this collection

Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.

Explore the program · Choose in My Virtues