Justice

What Justice means in a protective role

A delivery has arrived early for a community event. The easiest storage place is the quiet room reserved for visitors who need a break from the bustle. No one is in it yet. You find another place for the cartons. The cartons fit elsewhere after all. You had nearly given them priority over a person simply because they arrived first.

The empty space still has a purpose and future users. Justice brings those absent people into the present decision. It asks whose opportunity, access or agreed claim would be lost if the convenient option were chosen. This is more than being pleasant to the person standing in front of you.

Justice gives…

Justice helps arrangements remain dependable for people with less opportunity to object. It can turn a vague promise into something material: a usable room, an honored allocation or a burden distributed for defensible reasons.

Finding the balance

In ordinary life

A shared resource

You check who relies on a resource before lending it to the person whose request is easiest to hear.

A hidden burden

You notice that a convenient rota repeatedly leaves the same person with the unwanted work and seek a defensible arrangement.

Nearby virtues, different work

Fairness

Fairness weighs interests impartially; Justice focuses on what those interests make due.

Mercy

Mercy may reduce a deserved severity; Justice keeps the claims of other affected people from vanishing in that decision.

Recognizing a counterfeit

Bureaucratic compliance is a counterfeit of Justice when fulfilling a form replaces honoring the interest it was meant to protect. The relevant question remains whether people receive what is due.

How to cultivate Justice

• Identify people affected who are absent from the conversation.
• Trace what a promise or allocation is meant to make possible.
• Ask who bears the cost of the convenient solution.

Try it today

Before changing a shared arrangement, identify one person who relies on it but is not present. Check the relevant agreement and include that interest in the decision before committing to the shortcut.

Questions worth returning to

• Whose claim is easiest to overlook because they are absent?
• What would fulfillment look like in practice?

Choose your practice

These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.

Quotations and further reading

Seven selections to return to through the week. Follow a source link to read the surrounding passage.

1. Injustice often arises also through chicanery, that is, through an over-subtle and even fraudulent construction of the law.

   Marcus Tullius Cicero, De Officiis
   Book I, X, section 33

   Cicero identifies a way to satisfy words while defeating their purpose. A technically ingenious shortcut can still wrong the people an arrangement should serve.

2. In order that every punishment may not be an act of violence, committed by one man or by many against a single individual, it ought to be above all things public, speedy, necessary, the least possible in the given circumstances, proportioned to its crime, dictated by the laws.

   Cesare Beccaria, On Crimes and Punishments, in Crimes and Punishments
   Chapter XLII, Conclusion

   Beccaria gathers necessity, proportion and public reasons into his conclusion. The decision is constrained by its purpose and conditions rather than the decision-maker’s wishes.

3. The actual Justice must come by trained intelligence, by broadened sympathies toward the individual man or woman who crosses our path; one item added to another is the only method by which to build up a conception lofty enough to be of use in the world.

   Jane Addams, Twenty Years at Hull-House
   Chapter III, Boarding-School Ideals

   Addams revisits her youthful speech and still endorses its practical demand: judgment grows through trained inquiry and sympathy for particular people. Justice needs that contact with actual lives.

4. Reason gives each side time to plead; moreover, she herself demands adjournment, that she may have sufficient scope for the discovery of the truth; whereas anger is in a hurry: reason wishes to give a just decision; anger wishes its decision to be thought just:

   Seneca, Minor Dialogues, Together with the Dialogue on Clemency
   On Anger, Book I, XVIII

   Seneca contrasts inquiry with the urge to defend a verdict already reached. The surrounding story shows catastrophic harm when a decision-maker treats contrary evidence as an affront.

5. Recompense injury with justice, and recompense kindness with kindness.

   Confucius, The Analects
   Book XIV, chapter 36

   Asked whether kindness should answer every injury, Confucius gives justice a distinct role. The passage adds a useful tension: humane treatment still requires an answer appropriate to the wrong.

6. Politicians remark, that no oppression is so heavy or lasting as that which is inflicted by the perversion and exorbitance of legal authority.

   Samuel Johnson, The Works of Samuel Johnson, Volume III: The Rambler
   The Rambler, No. 148. SATURDAY, AUGUST 17, 1751.

   Johnson warns that the appearance of legitimate authority can shelter oppression. The paragraph goes on to show why an official title cannot by itself justify an action.

7. the idea of community responsibility for crime is spreading rapidly; (2) we are fast outgrowing the idea of punishing criminals merely, our object is to fit them into society.

   Mary Parker Follett, The New State
   Chapter XIV, The Group Principle at Work

   Follett gives an account of responsibility that extends beyond imposing a penalty. Her concern is also how a person can return to shared life and how the community contributes to the conditions of wrongdoing.

Continue through the catalog