Justice

The choice behind the ideal

In this collection, the older image of honourable conduct becomes a practical concern for fair terms. Justice is more than being pleasant to the people you already like. It can require returning an advantage, explaining a decision or hearing the person whose account interrupts your preferred story.

Justice can give the weaker claim room to be heard.

In an imagined village game, a player realises that their boot has crept over the throwing line. Their next toss would probably win. They step back and offer the other player the same chance to check the line. The game remains enjoyable because its result can mean something: both players competed under terms they could recognise.

Finding the balance

A fair rule gains its value from the people and purpose it serves. Precision that only protects your winning position is selective precision.

If the target is unreachable for one player, identical distances may cease to serve this friendly game. Agreeing an accessible arrangement openly can be fairer than treating an unsuitable rule as sacred.

What becomes possible

Justice supports trust in decisions because people can see how their interests entered the reasoning. It may leave competing claims unresolved, but makes arbitrary preference harder to disguise as entitlement.

In ordinary life

Sharing a credit

Explain which work belongs to whom before dividing recognition.

Allocating a useful space

Hear the needs of the quiet person as well as the person who has already made a claim.

Changing a rule

State the reason and invite affected people to consider it before applying it to their disadvantage.

Nearby virtues

Mercy

Justice asks what is due and how claims are considered. Mercy asks whether an available severity would add needless suffering.

Humility

Humility helps you notice what your account misses; Justice gives the missing person a place in the decision.

What can resemble it

Favouritism with reasons

Explaining only why a friend deserves an advantage can look like careful Justice. Apply the same relevant considerations to others.

Punishment as victory

Humiliating someone for a small breach can masquerade as restoring fairness. Genuine Justice attends to the repair, the affected people and proportionate consequences.

Ways to cultivate it

• Separate the relevant claim from how much you like its claimant.
• Ask who has not had a reasonable opportunity to explain their position.
• State a decision in terms you could accept if you were on its receiving side.

Try it today

These examples concern everyday fairness, not legal advice or permission to investigate or punish others. Fairness does not require abandoning your essential needs or treating every demand as equally justified.

Questions for reflection

• Which consideration would I retain if it cost me an advantage?
• Who cannot easily make their claim heard?
• Does this procedure serve the purpose of the decision?

The earlier virtue.net precept

Be fair in your dealings, but never surrender all of your needs or those needs of your loved ones.

Original wording from the preserved earlier site. The precept at the top of this page and the surrounding explanation are contemporary adaptations.

The wording and its history

These nine names and the archived precepts come from the earlier virtue.net collection. They are not established as one medieval code. The explanations, exercises, poems and illustrations on these pages are contemporary adaptations. Literary quotations retain their named source, edition and speaker.

Malory’s Arthurian romance, later fiction, drama, fables and poetry offer contrasting ways to examine the ideal. They do not document a single uniform historical practice.

Sources and preserved wording

Quotations and perspectives

Seven readings, one for each day of the week. Their speakers sometimes argue for positions worth questioning.

1. Strive to lay bare the truth, as well amid the promises and presents of the rich man, as amid the sobs and entreaties of the poor.

   Miguel de Cervantes · Don Quixote · English rendering: John Ormsby · Don Quixote advising Sancho
   Part II, chapter XLII; (zero-based)

   The advice asks a governor to resist both inducement and emotional pressure. Its pertinent question is whose evidence gets considered, not a modern courtroom procedure. Advice to Sancho sounds principled inside a novel that parodies knightly romance; compare the counsel with its speakers’ judgments and behavior.

2. yet that was for no evil work, nor for wooing neither, but because thou lovedst thy life—therefore I blame thee the less.

   Anonymous (Sir Gawain poet) · Sir Gawain and the Green Knight · English rendering: Jessie L. Weston, prose rendering (1898) · The Green Knight
   Part IV, explanation of the three blows; (zero-based)

   The judge considers motive rather than treating every breach alike. The elaborate trap and bodily threat make his authority questionable; attention to circumstances is examined without adopting the violent test as fair procedure.

3. it was no fault of Fangs that he was lame and could not gather the herd, but the fault of those that struck off two of his fore-claws

   Walter Scott · Ivanhoe · Wamba
   Chapter IV, discussion of Fangs; (zero-based)

   Wamba exposes blame imposed on a harmed dog by the very people responsible for its incapacity. The fictional exchange asks whether a demand ignores circumstances its makers created.

4. the stay of the oppressed, the redresser of grievances, the curb of the power of the tyrant

   Walter Scott · Ivanhoe · Ivanhoe
   Chapter XXIX; (zero-based)

   The knight names an affirmative ideal for chivalry. His dismissive treatment of Rebecca immediately tests whether his own account gives an outsider a fair hearing.

5. that no man take no battles in a wrongful quarrel for no law, nor for no world’s goods.

   Thomas Malory · Le Morte d’Arthur, Volume I · Narrator reporting Arthur’s charge
   Book III, chapter XV, Pentecostal oath; (zero-based)

   Arthur’s oath makes the worthiness of a cause a condition of action. It is a narrative rule within Malory’s work, not documentation that all historical knights observed it.

6. Give every man thine ear, but few thy voice: Take each man’s censure, but reserve thy judgement.

   William Shakespeare · Hamlet · Polonius advising Laertes
   Act I, scene III; (zero-based)

   The character’s advice separates hearing criticism from surrendering judgment. Polonius’s later conduct complicates his wisdom; the play’s speaker is identified rather than credited as Shakespeare’s own voice.

7. Hath not a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions?

   William Shakespeare · The Merchant of Venice · Shylock
   Act III, scene I; (zero-based)

   Shylock demands recognition of shared humanity after discrimination. The speech later appeals to revenge; recognition is retained while that proposed consequence is questioned.

Read further

• Miguel de Cervantes — Don Quixote (English rendering: John Ormsby)
• Anonymous (Sir Gawain poet) — Sir Gawain and the Green Knight (English rendering: Jessie L. Weston, prose rendering (1898))
• Walter Scott — Ivanhoe
• Thomas Malory — Le Morte d’Arthur, Volume I
• William Shakespeare — Hamlet
• William Shakespeare — The Merchant of Venice

Edition notes and the preserved precepts

Continue reading

← Courage · Knightly Virtues · Mercy →