Too little
Self-defense: you describe the pressure from above until the canceled leave becomes a regrettable detail in your own difficult week.
Name the harm caused by your decision without making an apology into a defense of your intentions.
Readiness to acknowledge one's wrongdoing with remorse rather than self-exoneration.
A leader’s decision can cost someone time that cannot simply be given back. Contrition names the wrong and its harm, listens to what repair would involve and gives up the effort to make good intentions an excuse.
Try a practice
You moved a deadline without checking the leave already agreed in the team. A colleague canceled a planned trip to cover the change. When you speak, you name your decision and the time it cost them before explaining anything about pressure from above. You ask what repair is still possible, take responsibility for what you can arrange and change how the next commitment will be checked. You had called it “just a schedule adjustment.” The word “just” has been doing work it cannot defend.
The problem is not merely that the colleague disliked your decision. You disregarded an existing commitment and left them carrying its cost. Acknowledgment keeps that harm in view while practical repair is considered. Their account may include losses you did not anticipate, and they need not forgive you to make those losses real.
Naming the decision and its effect gives repair a definite subject. Changing how commitments are made can reduce repetition, while a shorter defense spares the affected person the added work of reassuring you.
Self-defense: you describe the pressure from above until the canceled leave becomes a regrettable detail in your own difficult week.
Contrite responsibility: you name your decision and its cost, hear what was lost and undertake feasible repair and changed practice.
Self-punishing display: you announce that you are a terrible leader and make the colleague manage your remorse.
Let the harm guide acknowledgment and repair, while keeping responsibility for the response with the person who caused it.
Name the agreement you disregarded and who absorbed the cost.
Arrange what you can provide without asking the harmed person to organize your response or offer reassurance.
Humility welcomes correction about your limits. Contrition acknowledges a wrong you have already committed and its harm.
Justice asks what is owed to the affected person; Contrition acknowledges your responsibility for the wrong that made repair necessary.
An apologetic explanation is a counterfeit of Contrition when it makes pressure or good intentions the reason the harm should cease to matter. Contrition allows the affected person’s account to stand.
Reflect on a minor mistake in a decision that was yours. Write an acknowledgment naming the action and its effect, then identify a repair within your control. Respect privacy and do not reopen unwanted contact as an exercise.
These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.
About these practicesSeven selections to return to through the week. Follow a source link to read the surrounding passage.
I wrote him an ingenuous letter of acknowledgment, crav’d his forbearance a little longer, which he allow’d me, and as soon as I was able, I paid the principal with interest, and many thanks; so that erratum was in some degree corrected.
Benjamin Franklin, Autobiography
Autobiography; repayment to Vernon
Franklin links acknowledgment of misused money to repayment with interest. His phrase “in some degree” leaves room for costs that repayment does not erase.
Such a thing, we hear men every day saying, is commonly done, and they seem to think this a sufficient apology for what, in itself, is the most unjust and unreasonable conduct.
Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments
PART V. Of the Influence of Custom and Fashion upon the sentiments of moral approbation and disapprobation.; CHAP. II. Of the influence of custom and fashion upon moral sentiments.
Smith rejects common practice as a sufficient excuse for injustice. Other leaders’ similar decisions do not erase the harm of yours.
The situation of the person, who suffered by his injustice, now calls upon his pity.
Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments
Part II, Section II, Chapter II
Smith moves the wrongdoer’s attention toward the person harmed. Remorse brings another person’s loss into view.
mine the fault was who handed over to your care the things without assigning them their places. Had I done so, you would have known not only where to put but where to find them.
Ischomachus, as represented by Xenophon, in Xenophon, The Economist
Section VIII; Ischomachus recounting a conversation with his wife
Within Xenophon’s unequal ancient household, Ischomachus names the omission in his own instructions rather than blaming the person left unable to find what he asked for.
She had been often remiss, her conscience told her so; remiss, perhaps, more in thought than fact; scornful, ungracious. But it should be so no more.
Narrator of Emma, in Jane Austen, Emma
Volume III, Chapter VIII
After humiliating Miss Bates, Emma recognizes a pattern in her treatment and resolves to change it. Austen’s fictional scene makes changed conduct part of remorse.
I now wish to make the personal acknowledgment that you were right and I was wrong.
Abraham Lincoln, The Papers and Writings of Abraham Lincoln, Volume Six
Letter to Ulysses S. Grant, 13 July 1863
Lincoln acknowledges his mistaken judgment of Grant’s campaign. The admission names his error plainly.
Fabius was so far from using severity against him, that he called for him, and told him he was sensible of the neglect that had been shown to his merit and good service, which, he said, was a great fault in the commanders who reward more by favor than by desert;
Plutarch, Lives
Life of Fabius; account of the neglected Marsian soldier
Fabius acknowledges neglect by commanders before responding to a discontented soldier. His response begins by recognizing what the commanders themselves had failed to do.
Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.