Too little
Instant obedience
The urge is here, so I must check.
A momentary impulse decides what happens next.
The little bell has appointed itself your supervisor.
The cultivated restraint of impulses that would cause needless harm.
Self-Restraint is the contextual name for Self-Command: restraint of impulses that would cause needless harm. Here, the harm may be modest but repeated: an optional check displacing chosen work, or an impatient reply making someone else carry your frustration. The impulse can be present without receiving an automatic command over your next action.

You are halfway through a useful paragraph when the urge to check for an update appears. Imagine it arriving as a desk bell wearing a tiny crown. Your hand rises; then pauses. You finish the thought and decide whether checking serves anything you actually need. The bell may still ring. Its coronation, however, has been postponed.
An illustrative everyday situation
Pause before following the urge to check an optional update while reading.
Too little
The urge is here, so I must check.
A momentary impulse decides what happens next.
A fitting response
I can notice this urge before deciding.
You leave room for purpose and consequences to enter the choice.
Pursued too far
I must never want a distraction.
The impossible demand to control every feeling becomes another source of conflict.
Having an impulse and endorsing it are different events.
If the message may concern a genuine responsibility, check it. Self-Restraint is not an instruction to override informed judgment with a concentration rule.
A brief interval can protect the response you would choose on reflection. You can leave a cutting reply unsent, let an optional notification wait, or stop correcting someone merely to restore your feeling of control. The aim is thoughtful action, not a perfectly quiet mind.
You have limited optional app use for a month. A notification offers a reason to check now. Pause long enough to decide whether it is needed contact or merely the next attractive interruption. A considered exception is different from obeying every signal.
Notice the urge to change a shared file merely because someone used a different harmless style. Decide whether the change serves the work.
Temperance moderates an appetite across a pattern of choices; Self-Restraint concerns the impulse pressing for action now.
Integrity keeps action consistent with considered convictions; Self-Restraint can create the interval in which you remember them.
Pretending never to feel annoyed may imitate Self-Restraint. Genuine restraint concerns the response, not a requirement to erase the feeling.
Refusing to respond to a real need may look disciplined. Genuine Self-Command remains answerable to judgment and consequences.
Name the impulse without turning it into an insult about yourself.
Pause long enough to recall the purpose and likely effect.
Choose an action, including checking or stopping when there is a sound reason.
Do not postpone urgent needs, necessary care or access to support for the sake of this exercise.
When one low-stakes impulse to check an optional update appears, wait until a natural stopping point before deciding. Keep necessary communications available.
Let an impulse pass before deciding to follow it.
What might this impulse make me do that I would later regret?
Did the pause improve my choice or merely delay a necessary action?
Do not postpone urgent needs, necessary care or access to support for the sake of this exercise.
About these practices · DisclaimerSeven selections to return to through the week. Follow a source link to read the surrounding passage.
for the constant watching of himself becomes a torment to a man,
Seneca · Minor Dialogues · Of Peace of Mind, XVII · Aubrey Stewart translation, 1889 · excerpt
Seneca is criticizing the strain of maintaining a disguise. Here it distinguishes governing a response from continuously policing whether you look perfectly controlled.
Appearances, wait for me a little; let me see who you are, and what you are about; let me put you to the test.
Epictetus imagines addressing an impression before obeying it. The pause is for examining a reason, not for denying that a feeling is present.
but let the thing wait for you, and allow yourself a certain delay on your own part.
The surrounding passage concerns an attractive pleasure. Delay can preserve a choice about optional consumption; it is not a demand to postpone necessary care or support.
beg anger to grant you this at the first, not in order that it may pardon the offence, but that it may form a right judgment about it:
Seneca · Minor Dialogues · Of Anger, II, XXIX · Aubrey Stewart translation, 1889 · excerpt
Seneca gives a pause the purpose of judgment. With an ordinary interruption, wait before deciding what response is warranted; the pause need not excuse a real wrong.
When the pulse beats, and we feel emotion in ourselves, let us defer the business; things will indeed appear otherwise to us when we are calm and cool.
Montaigne warns against acting in anger. This page takes the pause into an ordinary response; it does not endorse the corporal punishment discussed in his historical setting.
habit took the advantage of inattention; inclination was sometimes too strong for reason.
Franklin admits the gap between intention and action. The recognition invites practice and adjustment instead of a claim that a good intention eliminates impulses.
Get them habitually to tell the truth, not so much through showing them the wickedness of lying as by arousing their enthusiasm for honor and veracity.
James gives restraint a positive purpose. Remember what the next considerate action protects, rather than building the whole practice around saying no to yourself.
Read freely, follow the twelve-virtue program, or adapt this collection in My Virtues. Focus and productivity do not measure your worth.