Integrity

What Integrity means in a networked world

Your group is compiling a public guide to repair shops. You have asked everyone to disclose connections. When your cousin’s workshop comes up, a popular member suggests leaving your relationship out: the recommendation will look more independent, and the shop deserves a boost. You include it anyway and describe the work you know. The rule has reached the family section and discovered that it still has a job.

Integrity carries a considered ethical commitment into the case where applying it costs you something. Online groups offer encouragement, shared purpose and useful collective work. Those goods become more dependable when membership does not require selective standards. Decide which principle is at stake and how it should apply here. Keeping it may involve declining a misleading contribution, stating a relevant connection or revising the group’s practice through an ordinary discussion. Convictions can also improve through reflection; integrity asks that the change be reasoned and reflected in action. You may lose an approving reaction or hear that you are making things difficult. That small social cost is part of this case: the standard matters when the exception would earn praise.

Integrity gives…

A shared project can become something people are willing to rely on. Consistent conduct makes the standards visible in the work itself, including the entries that flatter people close to you.

Finding the balance

In ordinary life

A welcome accusation

Use the same evidence standard for a claim against an opposing group as you would for a claim against your own.

A collaborative resource

Keep promised credit and agreed access conditions when the resource begins attracting a larger audience.

Nearby virtues, different work

Candor

Candor states the connection plainly. Integrity is the consistency between the standard you endorse and the contribution you make.

Humility

Humility leaves room to recognize a flaw in your standard. Integrity puts a considered correction into practice.

Recognizing a counterfeit

Group loyalty counterfeits Integrity when obedience to insiders is presented as faithfulness to principle. A shared commitment deserves allegiance through its ethical substance, not simply because the group rewards it.

How to cultivate Integrity

• State a principle in a form that includes cases inconvenient to you.
• Notice when a private exception would make your public standard misleading.
• Explain a revised standard and apply it to your own next contribution.

Try it today

Choose a small contribution you can freely make or revise. Apply the same relevant standard you would ask of someone outside your group. Where speaking openly could invite threats or retaliation, use private reflection or an appropriate support route instead of a public challenge.

Questions worth returning to

• What does my action teach readers about the rule?
• Am I changing my judgment for a reason I could explain, or for a reward I would rather conceal?

Choose your practice

These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.

Quotations and further reading

Seven selections to return to through the week. Follow a source link to read the surrounding passage.

1. A double standard of reality, one for our own private and more or less concealed interests, and another for public and acknowledged concerns, hampers, in most of us, integrity and completeness of mental action.

   John Dewey, Democracy and Education
   Chapter XIII, The Nature of Method, section 3, Single-mindedness

   A disclosure standard loses its force when your own interests receive a private exemption. Put the relationship beside the recommendation so readers can assess both.

2. Begin by prescribing to yourself some character and demeanor, such as you may preserve both alone and in company.

   Epictetus, The Works of Epictetus
   Enchiridion XXXIII; printed p. 389; scan leaf 413

   A standard worth keeping should guide conduct when the audience changes. Consider the person you mean to be before the group offers a convenient exception.

3. Besides, which would you rather have, a sum of money, or a faithful and honorable friend? Rather assist me, then, to gain this character, than require me to do those things by which I may lose it.

   Epictetus, The Works of Epictetus
   Enchiridion XXIV; printed p. 384; scan leaf 408

   A friend can ask you to protect your character rather than trade it for an advantage. Group loyalty need not mean cooperating in a compromised standard.

4. When you do anything from a clear judgment that it ought to be done, never shrink from being seen to do it, even though the world should misunderstand it; for if you are not acting rightly, shun the action itself; if you are, why fear those who wrongly censure you?

   Epictetus, The Works of Epictetus
   Enchiridion XXXV; printed p. 392; scan leaf 416

   First examine whether the action is right; then distinguish that judgment from fear of being seen. Disapproval alone does not settle the matter.

5. I have always thought it the duty of an anonymous author to write, as if he expected to be hereafter known.

   Samuel Johnson, The Rambler
   No. 208. SATURDAY, MARCH 14, 1752.

   Johnson gives anonymous writing the same standard as writing under a known name. A change of audience should not require a change of principles.

6. He acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks according to his actions.

   Confucius, The Analects
   Book II, chapter 13

   A public claim about your standards should agree with what you actually do. Disclosure makes that agreement available for others to judge.

7. There is one essential point wherein a political liar differs from others of the faculty; that he ought to have but a short memory, which is necessary according to the various occasions he meets with every hour, of differing from himself, and swearing to both sides of a contradiction, as he finds the persons disposed, with whom he has to deal.

   Jonathan Swift, The Examiner, in The Prose Works of Jonathan Swift, Volume IX
   The Examiner, NUMB. 15 in this edition (often numbered 14 elsewhere), November 9, 1710

   Swift’s political liar changes his claim with his company. Integrity asks whether you can stand behind the same account when it reaches a different audience.

Continue through the catalog