Too little
Only the lost plan
Nothing worthwhile happened; I did not finish my list.
Other people’s needs and contributions disappear behind the unfinished tasks.
An interrupted day may contain more than unfinished tasks.
Readiness to widen moral consideration beyond one's immediate provocation or position.
Perspective widens moral consideration beyond your immediate provocation or position. Looking back on a day, it asks whose needs and contributions have vanished behind your own disappointed plan. Your time and rest still count; the account becomes wider rather than simply turning against you.

At the end of the day, your unfinished list seems to have acquired the authority of a judge. You unroll it across the table. Your companion sets down a mended bag you needed; you remember the time you spent helping them untangle a confusing letter. Neither event appears on the original list. You roll the list back enough to see the person across from you. There is more to account for, and there is still room to say you wanted time of your own.
An illustrative everyday situation
Review an interrupted day with room for other people’s needs and contributions as well as your unfinished plan.
Too little
Nothing worthwhile happened; I did not finish my list.
Other people’s needs and contributions disappear behind the unfinished tasks.
A fitting response
My plan mattered. So did the care given and received, and I still need rest.
Several legitimate interests remain visible together.
Pursued too far
Helping someone is the only way to justify the day.
One narrow measure is replaced with another, and rest must once again be earned.
A wider account can include disappointment without letting it erase everyone else.
Repeated interruptions may still call for a different arrangement. Recognizing their human meaning does not require agreeing to be endlessly available.
You may stop calling a day empty merely because its value took an unplanned form. You may also see whose often unnoticed work made your own time possible, and which shared arrangements need to change.
Before praising your peaceful evening, notice whether someone else is still doing the work that freed it. Consider a fairer arrangement where needed.
Remember the person who needed the conversation as well as the task it displaced. Both interests can guide what you agree to next time.
Gratitude acknowledges a good received; perspective includes that contribution in a broader account of the day.
Self-respect keeps your own dignity visible when widening concern for other people.
A tally of help can become another performance measure. Perspective concerns whose interests count, not how admirable your totals look.
Saying that unfinished work does not matter can conceal real costs. A wider view retains concrete needs rather than making them small.
Name what disappointed you about the day.
Include one other affected person or contribution that your first account omitted.
Consider an arrangement that gives both their needs and yours a place.
Recall a minor interruption. Describe your own interest and one other interest involved, without inventing private motives. Ask whether the fuller account changes your judgment.
Make room for the interests your irritation hides.
Whose time or care is absent from my first account?
Have I made room for my own needs too?
Recognizing someone else’s need does not require accepting coercion, unlimited work or loss of necessary rest. Do not use a wider view to explain away an unfair arrangement.
About these practices · DisclaimerSeven selections to return to through the week. Follow a source link to read the surrounding passage.
Perpetual devotion to what a man calls his business, is only to be sustained by perpetual neglect of many other things.
Stevenson asks what a narrow account of duty leaves out. A day’s unfinished business may obscure care given and received, without making the unfinished obligations unreal.
we do not expect people to be deeply moved by what is not unusual.
George Eliot · Middlemarch · Chapter XX · English original, 1871–1872 · excerpt
Eliot exposes a limit of sympathy: familiar suffering can be overlooked precisely because it is common. Another person’s ordinary difficulty still belongs in the account.
I would not have any one adopt my mode of living on any account;
Henry David Thoreau · Walden · Economy · English original, 1854 · excerpt
Thoreau explicitly resists making his own arrangement a universal model. Your preferred pace need not be the standard by which another person’s life is judged.
But first consider how much more frugal are the poor than we, and how much more patient of hardship.
Epictetus challenges boasting about a chosen restraint by recalling people who have no such choice. Imposed hardship is not being recommended; the contrast checks pride in a leisurely lifestyle.
to think of people below them as if they really were fellow-passengers to the grave, and not another race of creatures bound on other journeys.
Fred challenges the social ranking named in his sentence. A wider view recognizes shared human standing instead of treating people with a different pace or circumstance as a separate kind.
One half of the world cannot understand the pleasures of the other.
Jane Austen · Emma · Volume I, IX; Emma to Mr. Woodhouse · English original, 1815 · excerpt
Emma responds to a difference in tastes. The line helps separate your preferred use of time from a rule about what another person ought to enjoy.
Whoever degrades another degrades me,
Whitman refuses to treat another person’s dignity as unrelated to his own. A fuller account of the day includes the standing of people whose needs or labour affected its shape.
Read freely, follow the thirteen-virtue program, or adapt this collection in My Virtues. A busy life is not a failed practice.