Too little
Casual optimism: “It will probably be fine.” You commit others to a load without checking capacity or permission.
Assess available help and your limits before choosing an unfamiliar course of action.
A disposition to weigh consequences before choosing a worthy course of action.
Prudence gives a worthy purpose a considered route. During disruption, weigh what an action asks of people, what help is available, what you actually know and what could follow. A plan can become more responsible when it grows smaller. The question is how to serve the need with due regard for consequences, rather than how to appear capable of everything.
Try a practice
The lift is unavailable, and the community room’s folding cart is piled with boxes. You admire its heroic cargo, then remove half before asking the caretaker how the remaining load can be moved. The cart is less crowded. It has also stopped auditioning for a landslide.
An invented illustrative scene.
Forethought can spare another person the costs of your optimistic estimate. Asking about limits lets a group divide work, postpone a nonessential task or find suitable assistance before a commitment becomes a problem.
A disrupted plan becomes negotiable. You can preserve its purpose while changing its scale, timing or means, and explain why the alteration serves the people involved.
Casual optimism: “It will probably be fine.” You commit others to a load without checking capacity or permission.
Considered planning: you identify the need, ask the responsible person about available help and adjust what you undertake.
Paralyzing precaution: you demand certainty about every minor detail and delay a decision whose ordinary consequences can already be assessed.
Prudence does not mean choosing the slowest option. If waiting changes the consequences, that belongs in the calculation too. In an actual emergency, qualified instructions matter more than this illustrative cart.
When a venue closes, compare the remaining options with the people affected instead of announcing the first substitute.
Name the time and assistance you can offer before accepting responsibility for a whole task.
Discernment examines whether the information is sound; Prudence weighs what acting on it may bring.
Humility acknowledges limited knowledge; Prudence incorporates that limit into the course chosen.
Dramatic self-reliance is a counterfeit of Prudence: accepting an unfamiliar task to avoid asking for help substitutes an image of competence for considered consequences.
Endless preparation is another counterfeit: refining a plan long after the relevant uncertainties are resolved can hide avoidance of a reasonable choice.
For an upcoming commitment, write down one consequence for yourself and one for another person. Ask whether your available time and help support the promise. Choose a different commitment if this one involves private or unsafe circumstances.
Afterward, compare the estimate with what actually happened. Revise the next promise rather than defending the first estimate.
This page supplies no lifting, evacuation or equipment instructions. Seek appropriate qualified guidance for unfamiliar or hazardous tasks; a character exercise is no reason to undertake them.
This page supplies no lifting, evacuation or equipment instructions. Seek appropriate qualified guidance for unfamiliar or hazardous tasks; a character exercise is no reason to undertake them.
These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.
About these practicesSeven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.
Man, consider first what the matter is (which you propose to do), then your own nature also, what it is able to bear. …
Epictetus · A Selection from the Discourses of Epictetus with the Encheiridion
(zero-based); exact span 0–117
Epictetus as transmitted by Arrian, in George Long’s translation · George Long translation; current Gutenberg 10661 transcription; exact first-print collation not asserted
English translation by George Long
Epictetus asks about both the undertaking and the capacity it requires. The cart’s worthy purpose does not establish that you can carry the proposed load. The surrounding athletic and philosophical training examples are descriptions, not assigned physical challenges.
… The most unambitious reform, recognizing the necessity for this consent, makes for slow but sane and strenuous progress, while the most ambitious of social plans and experiments, ignoring this, is prone to failure.
Jane Addams · Democracy and Social Ethics
(zero-based); exact span 559–773
Jane Addams · 1902 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
Addams makes consent relevant to the prospects of a social plan. The help your cart assumes should belong to willing participants. Her contrast between ambitious reform and consent is an argument, not a guarantee that agreement makes a plan succeed.
… To perform too many good deeds may be to lose the power of recognizing good in others; to be too absorbed in carrying out a personal plan of improvement may be to fail to catch the great moral lesson which our times offer.
Jane Addams · Democracy and Social Ethics
(zero-based); exact span 1491–1713
Jane Addams · 1902 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
The danger Addams names is becoming so absorbed in your own improvement plan that others’ contributions disappear. Asking the caretaker about available help lets the project become shared rather than a performance of your capability.
… The above explanation seems to be the more probable, but, of course, it must be tested by further research. …
Peter Kropotkin · Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution
(zero-based); exact span 195–302
Peter Kropotkin · 1902 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
Kropotkin qualifies a proposed historical explanation with the need for further research. A plan may likewise proceed on a tentative assessment while keeping its limits visible. This excerpt endorses the qualification, not the particular historical conclusion.
… But when I came to talk over the project with my friends, the best scheme I could devise seemed so wild and improbable, that I was fain to resign my hopes for a time, and so started for Navy Bay.
Mary Seacole · Wonderful Adventures of Mrs. Seacole in Many Lands
(zero-based); exact span 677–872
Mary Seacole · 1857 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
Seacole revises a proposed journey after discussion with friends reveals its difficulties. Deferring a cherished plan can be part of considered action. Her later wartime work does not prescribe imitation or establish that persistence always succeeds.
The porter, who was pulling about some heavy boxes, suggested to the gentleman, as there was so much luggage, whether he would not take a second cab.
Anna Sewell · Black Beauty
(zero-based); exact span 0–149
Black Beauty, fictional horse narrator, reporting the narrative or dialogue shown in context · 1877 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
The porter offers a second vehicle in response to the load, before the passenger refuses and the horse bears the cost. The scene exposes a consequence hidden by optimistic capacity claims; it supplies no modern loading instruction.
Further details as to modes of help must vary infinitely with circumstances and character. …
Octavia Hill · Homes of the London Poor
(zero-based); exact span 0–90
Octavia Hill · 1875 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
Hill acknowledges that assistance must vary with circumstances and the person. The cart cannot determine a suitable contribution by itself. Her wider paternalistic housing scheme is historical context, not an endorsed model of authority over recipients.
Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.