Syntharity

Include relevant context and contrary evidence rather than assemble only the details that support your allegation.

Readiness to seek a whole account faithful to its relevant evidence, without selective omission or forced coherence.

Syntharity is the site’s term for seeking a whole account faithful to the relevant evidence. In raising a concern, it means preserving context, relationships and inconvenient details. A whole account need not be a seamless story: sometimes its most honest feature is an unresolved gap.

Try a practice

The orange mascot places a tall green bar between two blue bars beneath a red downward arrow.

An account worth examining

The fundraising chart looks disastrous when its middle month is missing. Your first slide has an elegant downward arrow and a wonderfully empty space for the absent column. Put the column back, and the picture becomes a rise followed by a decline. The concern may remain, but it is now a concern about the actual pattern.

An invented illustrative scene.

Syntharity gives…

Syntharity gives a recipient enough context to understand how the pieces belong together. It resists both selective omission and the temptation to force every fact into one explanation.

What Syntharity makes possible

You can present a concern with its strongest complication attached. That makes disagreement more productive: people can examine the shared account rather than argue over which pieces have been hidden.

Syntharity: finding the balance

Too little

Fragment collecting: you show the declining months and omit the intervening rise. The pattern owes its force to selection.

A fitting response

Faithful whole: you restore the relevant month, explain the changed pattern and leave its cause open. The concern becomes narrower and more answerable.

Pursued too far

Forced coherence: you invent a reason for every fluctuation so the chart tells one complete tale. An attractive narrative covers uncertainty.

The whole is not everything you can gather. Relevant context helps explain the concern; unrelated personal information can obscure it and expose others.

Syntharity in ordinary life

A pattern with an awkward exception

Imagine an employee describing repeated overrides of a safeguard. One override followed an independently checked correction; the others lack that explanation. Including the exception does not make the pattern disappear. It shows exactly which decisions still need accounting for and prevents one broad allegation from swallowing distinct events. This is an invented descriptive example, not a disclosure assignment.

A message thread

Retain the earlier question that gives a short reply its meaning.

A repeated incident

Distinguish the common pattern from circumstances that make one instance different.

Nearby virtues, different work

Discernment

Discernment tests what each item can establish; Syntharity asks whether the account gives those items their relevant context.

Discretion

Syntharity avoids selective omission of relevant facts; Discretion excludes unrelated private material. Neither requires an indiscriminate dump.

Syntharity and its counterfeits

Evidence hoarding counterfeits Syntharity: an attachment pile can bury the relationship that matters. A faithful whole account supplies the relevant context and its limits, rather than every obtainable document.

Deleting contradictory facts may make a story smooth, but it makes story smoothing a counterfeit of Syntharity. Leave the unresolved contradiction visible so the reader can understand what the account cannot yet settle.

How to cultivate Syntharity

Check whether a quotation or number changes meaning when its surrounding context is restored.
Include the strongest relevant complication beside the concern it qualifies.
Mark a gap as a gap rather than filling it with a convenient motive.

Try it today

Take a harmless invented chart or short fictional exchange. Add one omitted fact that changes the interpretation, and rewrite the account around the fuller evidence.

Ask what should now be narrowed, qualified or left unresolved. More context should improve the account rather than merely lengthen it.

Use invented or nonconfidential material. Relevant context does not justify gathering or exposing unrelated private information; preserve uncertainty without attempting amateur investigation.

Questions worth returning to

Which omitted fact would make a fair reader understand this differently?
Have I confused a whole account with a tidy one?

Keep the practice proportionate

Use invented or nonconfidential material. Relevant context does not justify gathering or exposing unrelated private information; preserve uncertainty without attempting amateur investigation.

These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.

About these practices

Quotations and further reading

Seven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.

… To be still searching what we know not by what we know, still closing up truth to truth as we find it (for all her body is homogeneal and proportional), this is the golden rule in theology as well as in arithmetic, and makes up the best harmony in a Church; not the forced and outward union of cold, and neutral, and inwardly divided minds.
John Milton · Areopagitica
(zero-based); exact span 1362–1702
John Milton · 1644 work; preserved Gutenberg 608 digital transcription; no modern paraphrase
Milton contrasts continuing inquiry with a forced outward union. The restored month belongs beside the other columns; Syntharity does not inherit his assumption that every tension ultimately forms one theological harmony.
… The preconceived opinion which they brought to the bench was evidently this: 'Dreyfus was convicted of treason by a court-martial; he is therefore guilty, and we, as a court-martial, cannot declare him innocent; we know that to proclaim the guilt of Esterhazy would be to proclaim the innocence of Dreyfus.' …
Émile Zola · J’Accuse, excerpts in Émile Zola, Novelist and Reformer
(zero-based); exact span 686–993
Émile Zola, J’Accuse as translated and excerpted by Vizetelly · 1898 letter; historical English extracts in Vizetelly’s 1904 biography, preserved Gutenberg 57546 digital edition
Ernest Alfred Vizetelly English translation
Zola describes an institutional conclusion protecting an earlier conclusion. A chart selected to preserve its existing story can do a smaller version of that work. This is Zola’s account of a particular historical case, not a rule that institutions always suppress evidence.
… For in all such cases the erroneous opinion or motive was far from being wholly erroneous, or wholly without elements of truth and reality. …
John Morley · On Compromise
(zero-based); exact span 237–376
John Morley · 1874 work; preserved Gutenberg 11557 digital edition
Morley recognizes elements of truth inside an erroneous account. The misleading chart may contain real declines; correcting its selection does not mean every included fact was false.
… These facts get in the way of a clear and unbiassed judgment; they impede the democratic relationship and add to the self-consciousness of all concerned. …
Jane Addams · Democracy and Social Ethics
(zero-based); exact span 1961–2114
Jane Addams · 1902 work; preserved current Project Gutenberg digital edition; first-print collation not asserted
Addams describes how background judgments impede a clear relationship. Relevant context can expose an inherited interpretation that otherwise decides what the reader sees.
… In my communication to the "People's Messenger," I have put the essential facts before the public in such a way that every fair-minded citizen can easily form his own opinion. …
Henrik Ibsen · An Enemy of the People
(zero-based); exact span 17–192
Peter Stockmann, fictional dialogue · 1882 play; R. Farquharson Sharp English translation, preserved Gutenberg 2446 digital edition
R. Farquharson Sharp English translation
The Mayor claims to supply the essential facts while the next sentence reframes the danger chiefly as expenditure. The dramatic contrast tests what an account has left out; it does not accept his self-description as proof of completeness.
… The length or agreeableness of a journey does not depend on the few last steps of it, nor is the size of a building to be judged of from the last stone that is added to it. …
William Hazlitt · Table Talk: Essays on Men and Manners
(zero-based); exact span 1261–1433
William Hazlitt · 1821–1822 essays; current Gutenberg 3020 transcription
Hazlitt refuses to measure a journey or building by its last part alone. A final falling column likewise cannot fairly stand for an entire fundraising pattern.
… In both these points, as in many others, she benefited me as much by keeping me right where I was right, as by leading me to new truths, and ridding me of errors. …
John Stuart Mill · Autobiography
(zero-based); exact span 1180–1342
John Stuart Mill · 1873 work; preserved Gutenberg 10378 digital edition
Mill credits Harriet Taylor with maintaining sound judgments as well as correcting errors. A fuller account should preserve what remains supported while making room for new evidence.

Continue through the catalog

Practice this collection

Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.

Explore the program · Choose in My Virtues