Fairness

Resist judging a person by their resemblance to someone you already distrust.

An impartial disposition to give relevant interests and evidence their due.

Fairness gives relevant interests and evidence their due without letting resemblance do the judging. A costume, accent or association can awaken an old reaction before the present person has done anything. An impartial disposition asks what actually bears on this decision and applies that consideration to the favorite as well as the outsider.

Try a practice

The orange mascot compares two model bridges, one with a fallen wheel, beside a grey-brown companion wearing a striped cape.

A small heroic scene

At the model-hero contest, a newcomer wears the striped cape of the character you always distrust. Their model bridge holds its load; yours sheds a wheel. You record the result by the same rule. The villainous stripes have passed the test, and your impeccable costume has not.

An invented illustrative scene.

Fairness gives…

Fairness lets another person’s achievement count even when it unsettles your first impression. The newcomer earns the result the test supports. You also gain a better understanding of your own model, because the rule survives the moment when it stops favoring you.

What Fairness makes possible

A hero story can distinguish someone’s current conduct from the uniform they wear. In a club or shared project, you can hear a proposal from a person you initially dislike and assess its stated reasons. Impartiality is active work: identify relevant differences rather than pretending there are none.

Fairness: finding the balance

Too little

Borrowed suspicion: mark down the newcomer because the cape resembles an old rival’s.

A fitting response

Impartial assessment: apply the agreed load test and record what each model does.

Pursued too far

Difference-blind sameness: award identical marks despite relevant differences in the results. Equal treatment has stopped responding to the task.

If the contest rules accommodate different entry types, apply that distinction consistently too. Fairness uses relevant differences without smuggling in preferences.

Fairness in ordinary life

A shared proposal

Describe the reason you accept or reject an idea without relying on who suggested it.

A remembered disagreement

Check whether the present action supplies the concern or whether you have imported it from someone else.

Nearby virtues, different work

Justice

Fairness assesses impartially; Justice attends to what each person is ethically due.

Perspective

Perspective notices excluded concerns; Fairness weighs them without favoritism.

Fairness and its counterfeits

Automatic suspicion counterfeits Fairness when a stern appearance is treated as evidence of rigorous judgment. Fairness examines the current conduct and gives favorable evidence its weight, even when the first impression was hostile.

How to cultivate Fairness

Name the criterion before seeing whose result it favors.
Check an unfavorable first impression against the actual action.
Give your own preferred case the same scrutiny.

Try it today

In a shared choice, identify one relevant criterion and apply it to every option, including one you initially dislike. If a difference matters, explain it rather than forcing identical outcomes.

Look for a point where liking or disliking the source nearly replaced a reason.

Questions worth returning to

What evidence belongs to this person’s actual conduct?
Would this criterion survive if it favored someone else?

Keep the practice proportionate

These pages offer ideas for reflection and character practice, not professional advice. Choose practices suited to your circumstances and abilities. You may adapt, pause, or skip an exercise; putting yourself or someone else at risk is not proof of virtue.

About these practices

Quotations and further reading

Seven readings, one for each day. All remain available here. Historical arguments and fictional dialogue are identified in their source notes.

Blue is the color of the Munchkins, and white is the witch color. So we know you are a friendly witch.
L. Frank Baum · The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
“LET DOROTHY GO TO THE CITY OF EMERALDS” (zero-based)
Boq · Project Gutenberg 55 current HTML transcription; source typography preserved; first printing not collated
Boq classifies Dorothy by her clothes before knowing her. The mistaken identification exposes the leap from a familiar appearance to a judgment about the person.
In portraying the evil he is fighting, he does not recognize, or at least does not make clear, all the human kindness upon which it has grown.
Jane Addams · Newer Ideals of Peace
CHAPTER II SURVIVALS OF MILITARISM IN CIVIL GOVERNMENT (zero-based)
Jane Addams · Project Gutenberg 69879 current HTML transcription; source typography preserved; first printing not collated
Addams criticizes a reformer’s simplified portrayal of the opponent. A morally serious concern still needs an accurate account of people rather than a borrowed villain’s outline.
Any man who wants to do justice does not wait till the last minute to hear both sides of the question.
George Eliot · Middlemarch
CHAPTER XVIII. (zero-based)
Mr. Hawley · Project Gutenberg 145 current HTML transcription; source typography preserved; first printing not collated
Hawley uses an appeal to justice to hurry the vote before hearing more. The scene exposes a criterion that protects an existing decision instead of giving relevant accounts their due.
… no righteous judge pronounces a different judgment in his own case and in that of others.
Seneca · Minor Dialogues, Together with the Dialogue on Clemency
CONTENTS. (zero-based)
Seneca · 1889 George Bell and Sons; Aubrey Stewart translation; Project Gutenberg 64576 HTML display edition
Latin original, English translation
The comparison applies scrutiny to the judge’s preferred case as well. Impartiality must survive the point where the criterion stops favoring the person using it.
But he is not a liar. And I should have thought—but I may be wrong—that there was no religion to hinder a man from believing the best of a young fellow, when you don’t know worse.
George Eliot · Middlemarch
CHAPTER XIII. (zero-based)
Mr. Vincy · Project Gutenberg 145 current HTML transcription; source typography preserved; first printing not collated
Vincy distinguishes his son’s admitted faults from an unsupported accusation. His parental interest also matters: the challenge is to apply that evidential care beyond a preferred person.
… I never hear better sense from any one than Robert Martin. He always speaks to the purpose; open, straightforward, and very well judging. …
Jane Austen · Emma
(zero-based); exact captured edition
Mr. Knightley, addressing Emma · Project Gutenberg 158 current HTML transcription; source typography preserved; first printing not collated
Knightley assesses Martin’s actual judgment where Emma discounts him for his social position. His later disparagement of Harriet shows that this particular fairer assessment does not make him universally impartial. Judge relevant conduct rather than borrowing a person’s rank.
But it has not done so fairly, or well, and, therefore, it is ill served …
Charlotte Perkins Gilman · Human Work
XV CONSUMPTION (II) (zero-based)
Charlotte Perkins Gilman · Project Gutenberg 64098 current HTML transcription; source typography preserved; first printing not collated
Gilman questions how society provides for contributors, after arguing that mutual service needs provision in return. Fairness here examines the arrangement, rather than blaming a person from the outcome alone.

Continue through the catalog

Practice this collection

Choose this approved collection as an optional workbook program, or select individual virtues in My Virtues.

Explore the program · Choose in My Virtues