Reference reading

Selfishness

Taking convenient automation while disregarding other people's legitimate claims to privacy, credit or fair treatment.

The summary is convenient. The private details belong to everyone else.

A persistent preference for one's own advantage or convenience over other people's legitimate claims.

A legitimate personal benefit is not itself selfishness.

A raccoon feeds colorful envelopes into a machine and admires a small resulting sheet while an orange colleague reaches for an envelope.

How it takes hold

The summary saves a few minutes. The private information belongs to people never asked whether that saving justified its use. Convenience is counted closely while their claims remain outside the calculation.

Selfishness persistently prefers personal advantage or convenience over legitimate claims. Easy production does not make a displaced claim disappear.

Others bear exposure, correction work or lost credit so the user receives a tidy result. A real benefit can still depend on an unfair distribution of burdens.

Finding the distinction

Illustrative situation: private correspondence would simplify a personal summary.

Too selfish: available material is used without regard for others' claims.

Fitting: purpose, permission and alternatives are considered.

Overcorrection: every personal convenience is suspect.

Greed centers excessive acquisition; selfishness can protect a tiny convenience. Callousness disregards suffering, while selfishness can acknowledge a concern but give it unjustifiably little weight.

Personal benefits are legitimate. Purpose, consent, alternatives and actual claims matter.

Counterfeit of Frugality: A convenient summary is celebrated as economy while other people's privacy bears its cost. Genuine Frugality considers fitting use across the actual undertaking.

A response that restores something

A fair account includes what the convenient action requires: information, labor, attention or surrender of a boundary. It may reveal a less intrusive alternative.

Permission, limited material or another process can preserve both useful work and the other person's claim.

Fairness does not demand unlimited sacrifice. It refuses automatic priority for whichever convenience happens to be one's own.

Other perspectives

consuming the time and energy of another adult

Jane Addams · Democracy and Social Ethics

Read the source

Addams examines hidden costs of service, apt to convenience assembled from other people's work or information.

the qualities most useful to others

Adam Smith · The Theory of Moral Sentiments

Read the source

Smith identifies a positive outward orientation; the useful account asks whose interests the convenient result serves.

Read and compare

Whose legitimate claim is missing from this solution?

Fairness · Benevolence · Integrity

These are constructive virtue readings, not a list of automatic opposites. This reference article does not score character or assign a vice to its reader.